Toggle light / dark theme

Whole Brain Emulation & Substrate-Independence: New Beginnings For Old Minds

When a human mind can be emulated — memories, habits, and the weather of thought running on engineered hardware — “uploading” stops being an ending and becomes a beginning. Substrate-independent minds can be backed up, restored, paused without time passing, and deployed into new bodies: telepresence robots, swarms, or chassis built for heat and radiation. Distance turns into bandwidth as consciousness moves as data, bound only by light. Under the spectacle is a harder, technical question: what must be captured, at what scale, for an emulation to be someone — and what rights and power follow once persons are portable infrastructure?

Mind uploading has usually been told as a one-way escape hatch: a last-minute transfer from a failing body into a machine, the technological equivalent of outrunning a deadline. That framing makes the idea feel like a hospice fantasy — dramatic, personal, terminal. But it leaves out the second verb that changes everything. If a mind can be reproduced as a running process, it isn’t just uploaded once; it can be instantiated again, moved, paused, restored, and redeployed. Uploading is capture. Downloading is what makes a mind into something mobile.

The phrase “substrate-independent mind” tries to name that mobility without the melodrama. A substrate is the medium a mind runs on: biological tissue, silicon, specialized hardware, something not yet invented. Independence doesn’t mean the mind floats free of physics; it means the same meaningful mental functions might be implementable on different platforms, like a program that can run on different computers. The promise is not that neurons are irrelevant, but that the mind might be the pattern of information processing the neurons carry out — the thing they do, not the stuff they’re made of.

The screech of peeling sticky tape conceals a rapid train of tiny shockwaves, ultrafast imaging shows

A new experiment has uncovered the mechanism responsible for the screeching sound made by peeling sticky tape. Using a combination of ultrafast imaging and synchronized acoustic recordings, Sigurdur Thoroddsen and colleagues at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology have shown that the noise is produced by a rapid train of tiny shockwaves, released through a specialized form of stick–slip motion. The research is published in Physical Review E.

If you’ve ever used sticky tape, you’ll probably be all too familiar with the harsh sound it makes as it peels away from a surface. Yet despite decades of experimental scrutiny, physicists have yet to fully explain the origins of this intriguing acoustic effect.

Previous studies established that peeling proceeds via a “stick–slip” mechanism—a jerky motion characterized by brief, rapid accelerations interrupted by sudden stops. Similar dynamics underpin phenomena ranging from earthquakes to the squeak of basketball shoes on a polished wooden court. However, the fine details of how this process unfolds in peeling tape turned out to be more complex than they first appeared.

Tackling industry’s burdensome bubble problem

In industrial plants around the world, tiny bubbles cause big problems. Bubbles clog filters, disrupt chemical reactions, reduce throughput during biomanufacturing, and can even cause overheating in electronics and nuclear power plants. MIT Professor Kripa Varanasi has long studied methods to reduce bubble disruption.

In a new study, Varanasi, along with Ph.D. candidate Bert Vandereydt and former postdoc Saurabh Nath, have uncovered the physics behind a promising type of debubbling membrane material that is “aerophilic”—Greek for “air-loving.” The material can be used in systems of all types, allowing anyone to optimize their machine’s performance by breaking free from bubble-borne disruptions.

“We have figured out the structure of these bubble-attracting membrane materials to allow gas to evacuate in the fastest possible manner,” says Varanasi, the senior author of the study.

Why you can’t tie knots in four dimensions

We all know we live in three-dimensional space. But what does it mean when people talk about four dimensions? Is it just a bigger kind of space? Is it “space-time,” the popular idea which emerged from Einstein’s theory of relativity?

If you have wondered what four dimensions really look like, you may have come across drawings of a “four-dimensional cube.” But our brains are wired to interpret drawings on flat paper as two-or at most three-dimensional, not four-dimensional.

The almost insurmountable difficulty of visualizing the fourth dimension has inspired mathematicians, physicists, writers and even some artists for centuries. But even if we can’t quite imagine it, we can understand it.

Why Does This Galaxy Have Tentacles? Deep Space Mystery Stuns Astronomers

A newly discovered jellyfish galaxy, seen as it existed 8.5 billion years ago, is challenging assumptions about conditions in the early universe. Astrophysicists at the University of Waterloo have identified a newly discovered jellyfish galaxy that is now the most distant example of its kind ever

Biology, not physics, holds the key to reality

Three centuries after Newton described the universe through fixed laws and deterministic equations, science may be entering an entirely new phase.

According to biochemist and complex systems theorist Stuart Kauffman and computer scientist Andrea Roli, the biosphere is not a predictable, clockwork system. Instead, it is a self-organising, ever-evolving web of life that cannot be fully captured by mathematical models.

Organisms reshape their environments in ways that are fundamentally unpredictable. These processes, Kauffman and Roli argue, take place in what they call a “Domain of No Laws.”

This challenges the very foundation of scientific thought. Reality, they suggest, may not be governed by universal laws at all—and it is biology, not physics, that could hold the answers.

Tap here to read more.

The Color of Wonder and the Chemical Code of Creation

This essay is adapted from Traversal.

We look at a thing — a bird, a ball, a planet — and perceive it to be a certain color. But what we are really seeing is the color that does not inhere in it—the portion of the spectrum it shirks, the wavelength of light it reflects back unabsorbed. Our world appears a swirling miracle of blue, but its blueness is only a perceptual phenomenon arising from how our particular atmosphere, with its particular chemistry and its insentient stubbornness toward a particular portion of the spectrum, absorbs and reflects light.

In the living world beneath this atmosphere that scatters the shorter wavelengths as they pass, blue is the rarest color: There is no naturally occurring true blue pigment among living creatures. In consequence, only a slender portion of plants bloom in blue, and an even more negligible number of animals are bedecked with it, all having to perform various tricks with chemistry and the physics of light, some having evolved astonishing triumphs of structural geometry and optics to render themselves blue. Each feather of the blue jay is tessellated with tiny light-reflecting beads arranged to cancel out every wavelength of light except the blue.

The physics of sneaker squeaks: High-speed imaging shows how they arise from supersonic detachment pulses

Basketball shoes on a gym floor, bicycle brakes in need of a tune-up, or the squeal of tires are everyday examples of squeaking sounds. Such sounds have long been attributed to stick-slip friction, or a cycle of intermittent sticking and sliding between surfaces. While this framework explains many rigid-on-rigid systems such as door hinges, it does not fully capture the physics of soft-on-rigid interfaces, like shoes on a floor.

To shed light on this little-understood physical process, researchers at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS), in collaboration with the University of Nottingham and the French National Center for Scientific Research, have used high-speed imaging to investigate the dynamics of soft solids sliding rapidly on rigid substrates.

In a study published in Nature, the team led by first author Adel Djellouli, a postdoctoral fellow in the lab of Katia Bertoldi, the William and Ami Kuan Danoff Professor of Applied Mechanics at SEAS, reports that squeaking emerges from a previously unseen mechanism.

/* */