Toggle light / dark theme

Chandra resolves why black holes hit the brakes on growth

Astronomers have an answer for a long-running mystery in astrophysics: why is the growth of supermassive black holes so much lower today than in the past? A study using NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory and other X-ray telescopes found that supermassive black holes are unable to consume material as rapidly as they did in the distant past. The results appeared in the December 2025 issue of The Astrophysical Journal.

Ten billion years ago, there was a period that astronomers call “cosmic noon,” when the growth of supermassive black holes (those with millions to billions of times the mass of the sun) was at its peak across the entire history of the universe. Between cosmic noon and now, however, astronomers have seen a major slowdown in how rapidly black holes are growing.

“A longstanding mystery has been the cause of this big slowdown,” said Zhibo Yu of Penn State University, lead author of the new study. “With these X-ray data and supporting observations at other wavelengths, we can test different ideas and narrow down the answer.”

Is Spacetime Fundamental, or is it Emergent? With Brian Cox

In this conversation, Neil deGrasse Tyson and co-host Chuck Nice are joined by physicist Brian Cox to explore one of the deepest open questions in modern physics: whether space and time are fundamental—or emergent.

The discussion spans emergent spacetime, quantum entanglement, black holes, wormholes, and the black hole information paradox, including ideas like ER = EPR, causality protection, and whether information is ever truly destroyed. The core idea centers on the possibility that spacetime itself emerges from deeper quantum information structures, challenging our intuitive understanding of reality.

From ‘Are We The Universe’s Way of Knowing Itself? With Brian Cox’: • Are We The Universe’s Way of Knowing Itsel…

Get the StarTalk book, ‘To Infinity and Beyond: A Journey of Cosmic Discovery’ on Amazon: https://amzn.to/3PL0NFn.

Support us on Patreon: / startalkradio.

FOLLOW or SUBSCRIBE to StarTalk:

Why Time Flows Differently Between Galaxies

Thanks to Radiacode for sponsoring this video. Use the promo code “PBS” to get an exclusive 10% discount at: https://103.radiacode.com/PBS The universe is expanding and that expansion is accelerating under the power of dark energy and eventually all matter and energy will be dispersed over such unthinkable distances that nothing can stop space from blowing up infinitely. Unless of course cosmologists blundered and dark energy doesn’t even exist. Then it’s back to the drawing board. Sign Up on Patreon to get access to the Space Time Discord! / pbsspacetime Check out the Space Time Merch Store https://www.pbsspacetime.com/shop PBS Member Stations rely on viewers like you. To support your local station, go to: http://to.pbs.org/DonateSPACE Sign up for the mailing list to get episode notifications and hear special announcements! https://mailchi.mp/1a6eb8f2717d/space… the Entire Space Time Library Here: https://search.pbsspacetime.com/ Hosted by Matt O’Dowd Written by Matt O’Dowd Post Production by Leonardo Scholzer, Yago Ballarini & Stephanie Faria Directed by Andrew Kornhaber Associate Producer: Bahar Gholipour Executive Producer: Andrew Kornhaber Executive in Charge for PBS: Maribel Lopez Director of Programming for PBS: Gabrielle Ewing Assistant Director of Programming for PBS: John Campbell Spacetime is a production of Kornhaber Brown for PBS Digital Studios. This program is produced by Kornhaber Brown, which is solely responsible for its content. © 2024 PBS. All rights reserved. End Credits Music by J.R.S. Schattenberg: / multidroideka Space Time Was Made Possible In Part By: Big Bang Wojciech Szymski Bryce Fort Peter Barrett Alexander Tamas Morgan Hough Juan Benet Vinnie Falco Mark Rosenthal Supernova Grace Biaelcki Glenn Sugden Ethan Cohen Stephen Wilcox Mark Heising Hypernova Spencer Jones Dean Galvin Michael Tidwell Robert DeChellis Stephen Spidle Massimiliano Pala Justin Lloyd Matthew Pabst David Giltinan Kenneth See Gregory Forfa Alex Kern Zubin Dowlaty Scott Gorlick Paul Stehr-Green Ben Delo Scott Gray Антон Кочков Robert Ilardi John R. Slavik Donal Botkin Chuck Zegar Daniel Muzquiz Gamma Ray Burst Bryan White Aaron Pinto Kacper Cieśla Satwik Pani Param Saxena John De Witt Nathaniel Bennett Sandhya Devi Michael Oulvey Arko Provo Mukherjee Mike Purvis Christopher Wade Anthony Crossland Grace Seraph Stephen Saslow Tomaz Lovsin Anthony Leon Lori Ferris Koen Wilde Nicolas Katsantonis Richard Steenbergen Joe Pavlovic Kyle Luzny Chuck Lukaszewski Jerry Thomas Nikhil Sharma John Anderson Bradley Ulis Craig Falls Kane Holbrook Ross Story Harsh Khandhadia Michael Lev Rad Antonov Terje Vold James Trimmier Jeremy Soller Paul Wood Kent Durham jim bartosh John H. Austin, Jr. Faraz Khan Almog Cohen Daniel Jennings Jeremy Reed David Johnston Michael Barton Isaac Suttell Bleys Goodson Mark Delagasse Mark Daniel Cohen Shane Calimlim Tybie Fitzhugh Eric Kiebler Craig Stonaha Frederic Simon Jim Hudson Michael Purcell John Funai Adrien Molyneux Bradley Jenkins Vlad Shipulin Justin Waters Thomas Dougherty Zac Sweers Dan Warren Joseph Salomone Julien Dubois.

New Discoveries on Wormholes Are Changing Everything

Use code coolworlds at https://incogni.com/coolworlds to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan.

How do wormholes work? Are they actually possible? How could we make one? Join us today for a deep dive into the wormhole…

Written & presented by David Kipping, edited by Jorge Casas.

→ Support our research: https://www.coolworldslab.com/support.
→ Get merch: https://crowdmade.com/collections/coo
→ Check out our podcast: / @coolworldspodcast.

THANK-YOU to M. Howard, M. Metts, M. Provost, S. Shardool, M. Bueche, M. Williams, M. Morrow, R. Borbidge, M. Everest, M. Vystoropskyi, M. Bryant, M. Nimmerjahn, M. Schreiner, M. Canning, M. Stewart, M. Cartmell, M. Brooks, M. Smith, E. Garland, M. Borisoff, M. Danielson, M. Adler, M. Sanford, M. Smith, M. Larter, M. Devermont, M. Chaffee, M. Rockett, M. Aron, M. Daniluk, M. Corwin, M. Bylinsky, C. Fitzgerald, M. Kingston, M. Ortiz, M. Venzor, B. Gaalen, M. Muriuki, M. Schoen, M. Popovski, M. Frederick, M. Kruger, M. Bottaccini, M. Johnston, M. Huch, M. Singh, M. Sattler, M. McMillan, M. Brownlee, M. Armstrong, M. Williams, M. Souter, M. OBrien, M. Shamp, M. Kochkov, M. Schiff, M. Fitzsimmons, G. Belsak, M. Johnston, M. Gillette, M. Murphy, M. Gonzalez, M. Hedlund, M. Seay, M. Zajonc, M. Morrison, N. Offor, M. Alley, M. Hoffman, M. Ross-Lee, M. Haan, M. Elliott, M. Lovely, M. Donkin, M. Cunningham, M. Bassnett, M. Hansen, M. Vaal, M. Langley, M. Reese, W. Ruf, M. Ford, M. Herman, M. Fullwood, M. Edris, M. Czirr, M. Patterson, L. Deacon, M. Saint, M. Lee, M. Murray, M. Kennedy, M. Stevenson, M. Thomsen, M. Daughaday, M. Farabee & M. Matters.

MUSIC

ALICE sees new sign of primordial plasma in proton collisions

The ALICE Collaboration takes a step further in addressing the question of whether a quark–gluon plasma can be formed in proton–proton and proton–nucleus collisions. In the first few microseconds after the Big Bang, the universe was in an extremely hot and dense state of matter known as quark–gluon plasma (QGP), which can be reproduced with high-energy collisions between heavy ions such as lead nuclei.

In a paper published in Nature Communications, the ALICE Collaboration reports observing a remarkable common pattern in proton–proton, proton–lead and lead–lead collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), shedding new light on possible QGP formation and evolution in small collision systems.

Physicists initially believed that colliding small systems, such as protons, could not generate the extreme temperatures and pressures needed to form QGP. But in recent years, signatures of QGP have been observed in proton–proton and proton–lead collisions at the LHC, indicating that the size of the collision system may not be a limiting factor in QGP creation.

Micro Planets: Building Artificial Worlds with Black Hole Cores

What if we built entire planets around tiny black holes? Explore engineered micro worlds, artificial gravity, and the future of compact megastructures.

Get Nebula using my link for 50% off an annual subscription: https://go.nebula.tv/isaacarthur.
Watch my exclusive video Lazarus Protocols: https://nebula.tv/videos/isaacarthur–… out Practical Engineering: https://nebula.tv/practical-engineeri… 🛒 SFIA Merchandise: https://isaac-arthur-shop.fourthwall… 🌐 Visit our Website: http://www.isaacarthur.net ❤️ Support us on Patreon: / isaacarthur ⭐ Support us on Subscribestar: https://www.subscribestar.com/isaac-a… 👥 Facebook Group: / 1,583,992,725,237,264 📣 Reddit Community: / isaacarthur 🐦 Follow on Twitter / X: / isaac_a_arthur 💬 SFIA Discord Server: / discord Credits: Micro Planets — Building Artificial Worlds with Black Hole Cores Written, Produced & Narrated by: Isaac Arthur Graphics from Jeremy Jozwik & Ken York Music Courtesy of Chris Zabriskie & Stellardrone Select imagery/video supplied by Getty Images Chapters 0:00 Intro 1:14 Small Worlds, Big Numbers 7:54 What to make it from? 11:53 What is a Micro Planet, and what is it like? 17:50 So could you go even smaller? 21:20 Nebula.
Check out Practical Engineering: https://nebula.tv/practical-engineeri

🛒 SFIA Merchandise: https://isaac-arthur-shop.fourthwall
🌐 Visit our Website: http://www.isaacarthur.net.
❤️ Support us on Patreon: / isaacarthur.
⭐ Support us on Subscribestar: https://www.subscribestar.com/isaac-a
👥 Facebook Group: / 1583992725237264
📣 Reddit Community: / isaacarthur.
🐦 Follow on Twitter / X: / isaac_a_arthur.
💬 SFIA Discord Server: / discord.
Credits:
Micro Planets — Building Artificial Worlds with Black Hole Cores.
Written, Produced & Narrated by: Isaac Arthur.
Graphics from Jeremy Jozwik & Ken York.
Music Courtesy of Chris Zabriskie & Stellardrone.
Select imagery/video supplied by Getty Images.

Chapters.
0:00 Intro.
1:14 Small Worlds, Big Numbers.
7:54 What to make it from?
11:53 What is a Micro Planet, and what is it like?
17:50 So could you go even smaller?
21:20 Nebula

Rubin Alert Leads to First Follow-Up Observations and Detection of Four Supernovae

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory commenced operations last summer with the release of its “first light” images. During its ten-year Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), the observatory will study the Universe for indications of Dark Matter and Dark Energy. It will also create an inventory of objects within the Solar System, and explore the sky for “transient” objects — i.e., those that move or change in brightness. These include asteroids, comets, interstellar objects (ISOs), transient stars, and supernovae.

To ensure follow-up observations of these objects, the National Science Foundation (NSF) has developed a system to enable rapid responses to Rubin-generated alerts. This allows observatories around the world to aim their telescopes at fleeting objects in the night sky and conduct rapid follow-up observations before they disappear. The system was recently validated when Rubin issued a series of alerts that led to the classification of four supernovae, which are a vital tool for measuring the expansion rate of the Universe.

The system incorporates a series of tools developed by NSF’s National Science Foundation National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory (NOIRLab), including an alert-filtering system, an automatic observation request manager, a network of telescopes — the Astronomical Observatory Event Network (AEON) — to conduct observations, and automatic data reduction software. This system helps to process the millions of alerts Rubin is expected to generate every night once the LSST begins.

Sean M. Carroll

“I like to say that physics is hard because physics is easy, by which I mean we actually think about physics as students.”

Up next, The Multiverse is real. Just not in the way you think it is. ► • The Multiverse is real. Just not in the wa…

Physics seems complicated, until you realize why it works so well, says physicist Sean Carroll, revealing the basis of the field’s greatest successes: Radical simplicity.

Carroll takes us from Newton’s clockwork universe to Laplace’s demon, to Einstein’s spacetime revolution, exploring the historical shockwaves each breakthrough caused. If you’ve wondered how stripping the world down to its simplest parts can reveal deeper truths, this is where that story begins.

00:00:00 Radical simplicity in physics.
00:00:55 Chapter 1: The physics of free will.
00:04:55 Laplace’s Demon.
00:06:27 The clockwork universe paradigm.
00:07:41 Determinism and compatibilism.
00:08:45 Chapter 2: The invention of spacetime.
00:17:30: Einstein’s general theory of relativity.
00:24:27 Chapter 3: The quantum revolution.
00:28:05 The 2 biggest ideas in physics.
00:32:27 Visualizing physics.
00:38:17 Quantum field theory.
00:46:51 The Higgs boson particle.
00:47:28 The standard model of particle physics.
00:52:53 The core theory of physics.
01:02:03 The measurement problem.
01:13:47 Chapter 4: The power of collective genius.
01:16:19 A timeline of the theories of physics.

Why Does 2 + 2 = 4? What Math Teaches Us About Deep Reality

Is math something humans invent—or something we discover? And why does it describe the universe so uncannily well?

In this episode of Uncommon Knowledge, Peter Robinson sits down with mathematicians David Berlinski, Sergiu Klainerman, and Stephen Meyer to explore one of the deepest mysteries in science and philosophy: the reality of mathematics.

From the simple certainty that 2 + 2 = 4 to the mind-bending mathematics behind black holes and quantum physics, the conversation asks why abstract numbers—created in the human mind—map so perfectly onto the physical world. Is mathematics purely logical, or does it point to a deeper structure of reality that isn’t material at all? Along the way, the panel explores beauty in science, the “unreasonable effectiveness” of math, and whether the concept of materialism can really explain the world we live in.

This wide-ranging discussion blends mathematics, physics, philosophy, and metaphysics into a fascinating conversation about truth, beauty, and the nature of reality itself.

__________
The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.

/* */