Toggle light / dark theme

SpaceX is skipping the booster catch on Starship V3’s debut flight — and the reason quietly reveals which milestone Musk actually cares about hitting before Artemis

SpaceX will not attempt to catch the Super Heavy booster on Starship V3’s debut flight. The booster will steer itself to a soft splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico instead of returning to the launch tower’s mechanical arms — the maneuver that became the defining image of the program on multiple V2 flights. For a company that has made spectacle a core part of its engineering culture, skipping the catch is a tell. It signals what Elon Musk and his engineers actually care about getting right on this flight, and it isn’t the part that makes for a good replay.

SpaceX files for $55 billion semiconductor fab in rural Texas for Musk’s Terafab — total chipmaking fab investment could reach $119 billion

SpaceX has filed a property tax abatement application in Grimes County, Texas, for a semiconductor fab that would cost $55 billion in its initial phases and up to $119 billion if all planned expansions are completed.

The filing, posted on the county government’s website ahead of a public hearing scheduled for June 3, describes the project as a “multi-phase, next-generation, vertically integrated semiconductor manufacturing and advanced computing fabrication facility” to be built at the Gibbons Creek Reservoir site, roughly 90 miles northeast of Austin.

The capital figures in this filing far exceed what was disclosed when Elon Musk announced Terafab in March, where the project carried a $20 billion price tag. Musk later confirmed during Tesla’s earnings call that SpaceX would handle high-volume chip manufacturing while Tesla operates a smaller R&D pilot line at its Austin campus. The Grimes County filing appears to be SpaceX’s first formal step toward securing a site for that production facility.

Elon Musk’s xAI sues over Colorado’s AI antidiscrimination law, claiming it’s a threat to Grok’s free speech

Senate Bill 205, passed in 2024, is one of the nation’s first attempts to regulate ‘high-risk’ AI systems and protect consumers from ‘algorithmic discrimination’ — or disparate treatment or impacts on protected classes under Colorado law.

In the complaint, which was filed in federal court in Denver, Musk’s lawyers contend that the law is ‘unconstitutionally vague’ and ‘invites arbitrary enforcement’ because it fails to define some key terms. They also contend that Colorado’s law would cause Musk’s AI chatbot, Grok, to ‘abandon its disinterested pursuit of truth and instead promote the State’s ideological views on various matters, racial justice in particular,’ which they say violates the First Amendment.

‘Unless the implementation and enforcement of SB24-205 is enjoined, it will violate xAI’s constitutional rights and cause irreparable constitutional harm, impose enormous burdens on xAI and the AI industry, and substitute Colorado’s political preferences for the national economic and security imperative of American AI dominance,’ the complaint reads in part…

…State Rep. Briana Titone, D-Arvada, one of Senate Bill 205’s lead sponsors, told The Sun that Musk’s lawsuit seems like a ‘fishing expedition’ that misinterprets the core of the law.

‘This is where the disconnect is. SB 205 is about consequential decisions, not about freedom of speech,’ Titone said. ‘It’s completely detached from it. And they’re trying to use this argument for a law that has nothing to do with what he’s saying. We’re not restricting speech. Our bill does not say that Grok still can’t be a dick.’


The lawsuit was filed at a time when the Trump administration looks to preempt state regulation of AI models through executive fiat.

The Race to Harness Quantum Computing’s Mind-Bending Power | The Future With Hannah Fry

Get “The AI Career Survival Guide” here: https://technomics.gumroad.com/l/ai-survival-guide.
What happens when human labor becomes mathematically obsolete? For thousands of years, the global economy has run on the biological engine of human workers. But a new era has arrived: The Physical Singularity.
In this video, we break down the brutal thermodynamics of the labor inversion, revealing how major AI companies are mass-producing humanoid robots that operate for just 57 cents an hour. We expose the massive industry shift from digital generation to “World Models,” and how China’s manufacturing miracle is driving hardware costs to zero. With 10 billion robots projected by the 2040s, experts like Geoffrey Hinton are warning of a hive-mind “alien intelligence.” The digital era is over. The physical agent era has begun.
Welcome to Technomics. If you want to stay ahead of the curve and understand the real impact of the AI revolution, hit that subscribe button.
Sources & Research Links:
The 57¢ / Hour Labor Inversion Math: https://www.ark-invest.com/articles/valuation-models/ark-pub…oid-robots.
Unitree G1 Official $16,000 Pricing: https://www.unitree.com/g1/
China’s 2024 Robotics Dominance (IFR Report): https://ifr.org/ifr-press-releases/news/china-dominates-industrial-robot-market.
Elon Musk’s 10 Billion Robot Prediction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODsjGOGX_oM
Geoffrey Hinton on AI Hive Mind (“Immortality, but it’s not for us”): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpoRO378qRY
Geordie Rose on Alien Intelligence (“The same way you don’t care about an ant”): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pd4i2YlGmc.
DeepSeek AI Cost Efficiency Breakthroughs: https://www.deepseek.com/
Timestamps:
00;00 — The 57¢ Workforce & The Great Deception.
02;48 — The Math of the Labor Inversion.
05;01 — Why OpenAI Killed Sora (World Models)
09;16 — The Manufacturing Miracle: China’s Hardware Collapse.
12;53 — 10 Billion Robots & Alien Intelligence.
15;58 — How to Survive the Singularity.
Disclaimer:
The content in this video is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. The views and opinions expressed in this video are based on current research and industry trends, which are subject to rapid change. We do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the projections discussed. Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
#PhysicalSingularity #HumanoidRobots #ArtificialIntelligence #OpenAI #FutureOfWork #TechTrends

Read more

Space Updates / Overmedicated Children

In the first half, space historian and author Rod Pyle discussed the renewed U.S. lunar ambitions under NASA’s Artemis program, along with other space news. Describing the recent Artemis rocket launch as “smooth as silk,” he praised the Space Launch System (SLS), though he acknowledged its high cost and reliance on shuttle-era technology. He explained that the SLS was built under NASA’s traditional cost-plus contracting model, contrasting it with private-sector efforts like SpaceX and Blue Origin, which assume more financial risk. Comparing Artemis to the Apollo-era Saturn V, Pyle noted both rockets are “remarkable machines” suited to their missions, but highlighted that Artemis cannot carry both the lunar module and capsule in a single launch as Saturn V did.

He outlined the Artemis timeline, with Artemis III originally planned for a Moon landing next year, now delayed to Artemis IV in 2028. Pyle also commended NASA chief Jared Isaacman for navigating budgetary challenges and advancing the Artemis program despite delays. Reflecting on the historic Apollo 8 mission as “a remarkably daring and dangerous mission” driven by Cold War geopolitics, he recalled the iconic “reading of Genesis from lunar orbit” and the transformative Earthrise photo. Elon Musk’s pivot from Mars to the Moon was driven by financial incentives and NASA funding delays, he suggested, noting that lunar missions are “a few days away, instead of seven or eight months,” making the Moon a more achievable target.

Addressing current spacefaring nations, the guest identified the U.S., Russia, China, Japan, and India as major players, with China rapidly advancing. China’s lunar program is “very steady and consistent,” Pyle said, and is aiming for a 2029–2030 landing that will replicate Apollo 11’s short visit, with longer-term plans for a lunar base. He raised the question of whether the U.S. and China can coexist on the Moon if both establish bases. On technology, he cited AI’s role in rover autonomy despite hardware limitations, noting successful AI-driven test drives on Mars. Looking further ahead, he projected human Mars missions in the mid-2030s, contingent on nuclear propulsion and necessary infrastructure.

Elon Musk: What’s Outside the Simulation?

Video Credit: @lexfridman.

About this video:
In this video, Elon Musk joins Lex Fridman to discuss one of the most profound questions of our time: Are we living in a simulation?
When asked what single question he would pose to an Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), Musk delivers a mind-bending response that challenges our entire perception of reality.
He dives deep into the Simulation Theory, questioning what exists beyond the “digital” boundaries of our universe and whether we can ever truly know the truth.
If you’ve ever wondered about the Matrix, the future of AI, or the mystery of existence, this conversation is a must-watch!

Hashtags:
#elonmusk #elonmuskinterview #lexfriedman #simulationtheory #simulation #agi #ai #artificialintelligence #matrix #sciencefacts #universesecrets #technews #markuspodcast.

Disclaimer:
All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and I or this channel don’t claim any rights over them.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Read more

Let’s unravel what happens when AI merges with quantum, and starts knowing EVERYTHING ♾️ Go to to get 83% off from our sponsor Private Internet Access with 4 months free!

Want to support our production? Feel free to join our membership at https://www.youtube.com/BeeyondIdeas/join.

Special thanks to our beloved YouTube members this month: Powlin Manuel, Saïd Kadi, Chenxi, Lord, Sudhir Paranjape, Nate Lachae, Alison Rewell, Thomas Lapins, Ahmad Salahudin, Antonio Ferriol Colombram, Anton Nicolas Burger 🚀🚀🚀

Experts featured in this video include Demis Hassabis, Tristan Harris, Aza Raskin, Elon Musk, David Deutsch, Michio Kaku, Brian Greene and Nick Bostrom.

Chapter:
0:00 A dangerous truth?
1:29 AI advancement.
3:46 AI pretending not to know.
7:29 Interactive tutoring.
9:37 That’s it from our sponsor!
10:21 The merging of QC and AI
12:03 IBM 100,000 qubits.
14:34 AI wipes out humanity?
16:05 Google Willow.
17:06 The misuse of AI and QC
18:22 Singularity and Turing test.
22:51 Reverse Turing test.
29:39 Quantum-AI consequences.
32:25 The double slit experiment.
36:15 Quantum multiverse.
41:05 Computing history.
46:49 AGI timeline.
51:45 Philosophical consequence.

#AI #quantumcomputing #singularity

Read more

/* */